CastleCops, Internet Crime Fighters
Need help? Click here to register for free! Absolutely zero advertisements on this site!

Donation/Premium
spacer
block bottom
Security Central
spacer
· Home
· PIRT/Fried Phish
· MIRT
· SIRT
· Deutsch
· Wiki
· Newsletter
· O16/ActiveX
· CLSID List
· Contest2007
· Downloads
· Feedback (send)
· Forums
· HijackThis
· Hijacktrend
· LSPs
· My Downloads
· O18
· O20
· O21
· O22
· O23
· O9
· Premium
· Private Messages
· Proxomitron
· Reviews
· Search
· StartupList
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· WsIRT
· Your Account
· Acceptable Use Policy
block bottom
spacer spacer
image Spam-Spackers: Antispam Law's Effectiveness Doubted image
SPAM
Antispam Law's Effectiveness Doubted
Tech leaders in business expect to keep their spam filters in place despite new law.
Grant Gross,
IDG News Service

WASHINGTON -- An antispam bill that was poised to become law in the new year may do little to stem the barrage of junk e-mail, according to corporate information and technology officers who deal with the problem daily.

The legislation, called the CAN-SPAM (Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing) Act, was signed into law by President George W. Bush earlier in December.

It requires senders of unsolicited commercial e-mail to let recipients opt out of future mailings, sets penalties for sending deceptive messages, and begins the process of creating a national Do Not Spam list. The measure requires all e-mail advertising--not just unsolicited messages--to include a valid reply-to address, a valid postal address, and accurate headers and subject lines.


Concerns Remain
But CIOs say it won't work, since so much spam comes from outside the United States.

Tod Ferran, CIO of Riverton Motor, an auto dealership based in Sandy, Utah, says you'd need the authority of a world government to enforce such a law. Instead, he favors a technological solution. The open-source Mozilla e-mail system he uses includes a junk e-mail filtering feature, he notes. He also recommends education of the public to not respond to spam solicitations.

Matt Kesner, chief technology officer of the Fenwick & West law firm based in Mountain View, California, says he thinks legislating against spam is worth a try. Still, he questions why Congress would pass a bill that would trump a strong new California antispam law.

That measure, passed in September but overruled by the federal law, would have required marketers to get permission from or have an existing business relationship with a recipient before sending e-mail. Without better technological and legal solutions, Kesner says he's afraid we'll get to the point where we accept e-mail only from people we know.

More at PCWorld
Posted on Friday, 26 December 2003 @ 04:25:00 UTC by phoenix22 (1236 reads)
[ Trackback ]
image

"Spam-Spackers: Antispam Law's Effectiveness Doubted" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search
Threshold
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Antispam Law's Effectiveness Doubted (Score: 1)
by !Mariner (duxdlux@bebop.com)  on Friday, 26 December 2003 @ 12:14:01 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
Concerted global effort required or else forget it as it won't work. Everybody has to be singing from the same hymn sheet for it to stand a chance.


 
Login
spacer
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Type Security Code: Usage signifies AUP acceptance
· New User? · Click here to create a registered account.
block bottom
Related Links
spacer
· del.icio.us!
· digg it!
· reddit!
· TrackBack (0)
· HotScripts
· W3 Consortium
· Mozilla
· Spam Cop
· More about SPAM
· News by phoenix22


Most read story about SPAM:
Messenger Pop-up Spam makes us sick

block bottom
Article Rating
spacer
Average Score: 4
Votes: 1


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Bad
Regular
Good
Very Good
Excellent


block bottom
Options
spacer

Printer Friendly Page  Printer Friendly Page

block bottom
spacer spacer