CastleCops, Internet Crime Fighters
Need help? Click here to register for free! Absolutely zero advertisements on this site!

Donation/Premium
spacer
block bottom
Security Central
spacer
· Home
· PIRT/Fried Phish
· MIRT
· SIRT
· Deutsch
· Wiki
· Newsletter
· O16/ActiveX
· CLSID List
· Contest2007
· Downloads
· Feedback (send)
· Forums
· HijackThis
· Hijacktrend
· LSPs
· My Downloads
· O18
· O20
· O21
· O22
· O23
· O9
· Premium
· Private Messages
· Proxomitron
· Reviews
· Search
· StartupList
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· WsIRT
· Your Account
· Acceptable Use Policy
block bottom
spacer spacer
image The Legislature: New Laws Raise New Bulk E-mail Issues image
SPAM
New Laws Raise New Bulk E-mail Issues
December 30, 2003
(5:58 p.m. EST)
By W. David Gardner,
TechWeb News

Legitimate businesses face new state and federal anti-spam laws that take effect Thursday, and they raise new issues for businesses trying to use e-mail within the letter of the law.

The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 may not have much impact on offshore operations, those beyond the reach of U. S. law enforcement, but the new law will have an impact on some respectable companies, said Charles Kennedy, a lawyer specializing in computer and communications law.

“A guy with a server in Antigua sending porn won't comply. But a U. S. bank offering credit cards will have to comply,” said Kennedy, an attorney in the Washington, D. C., office of Morrison & Foerster.

The legislation, signed Dec. 16 by President Bush, was aimed to eliminate the patchwork of states' anti-spam regulations. A particularly tough law in California is also scheduled to take effect Thursday, but the federal law will pre-empt most of the provisions of the anti-spam laws of California and other states, Kennedy said.

Kennedy said he has advised more than 200 clients -- all legitimate users and would-be users of e-mail messages -- to focus on two main issues regarding the new law. First, they must provide an “opt-out” -- an email or URL address users can utilize to stop the sender from sending future unsolicited messages. Second, there must be a label in the message specifying that the message is an ad or a solicitation.

“Everything is a little less confusing because of the federal law,” Kennedy said. “A big reason for the federal law was the confusion caused by the state laws. The states can still enforce some anti-spam (provisions) and state prosecutors can even use some parts of the federal law.”

Kennedy recommends that respectable operations sending legitimate e-mail should also acquaint themselves with European anti-spam regulations. “The Europeans,” he said, “are generally more aggressive about e-mail. If you are an American company, you have to be careful if you have an office or a server in Europe.”

More at TechWeb
Posted on Wednesday, 31 December 2003 @ 04:25:00 UTC by phoenix22 (968 reads)
[ Trackback ]
image

"The Legislature: New Laws Raise New Bulk E-mail Issues" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
Threshold
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register
 
Login
spacer
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Type Security Code: Usage signifies AUP acceptance
· New User? · Click here to create a registered account.
block bottom
Related Links
spacer
· del.icio.us!
· digg it!
· reddit!
· TrackBack (0)
· HotScripts
· W3 Consortium
· Spam Cop
· More about SPAM
· News by phoenix22


Most read story about SPAM:
Messenger Pop-up Spam makes us sick

block bottom
Article Rating
spacer
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Bad
Regular
Good
Very Good
Excellent


block bottom
Options
spacer

Printer Friendly Page  Printer Friendly Page

block bottom
spacer spacer