CastleCops, Internet Crime Fighters
Need help? Click here to register for free! Absolutely zero advertisements on this site!

Donation/Premium
spacer
block bottom
Security Central
spacer
· Home
· PIRT/Fried Phish
· MIRT
· SIRT
· Deutsch
· Wiki
· Newsletter
· O16/ActiveX
· CLSID List
· Contest2007
· Downloads
· Feedback (send)
· Forums
· HijackThis
· Hijacktrend
· LSPs
· My Downloads
· O18
· O20
· O21
· O22
· O23
· O9
· Premium
· Private Messages
· Proxomitron
· Reviews
· Search
· StartupList
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· WsIRT
· Your Account
· Acceptable Use Policy
block bottom
spacer spacer

wireshark malicious traffic protocol tlsv1

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic       All -> FavForums -> MIRT Discussion [del.icio.us!] [digg it!] [reddit!]
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
zoney

Cadet
Cadet


Joined: Mar 07, 2008
Posts: 6
Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 8:13 pm    Post subject: wireshark malicious traffic protocol tlsv1
Reply with quote

I don't know if this is the appropriate forum but I wondered if anyone had seen anything like this before. I ran wireshark wide open during on the night of Feb 25/26 and saw this:

My PC initiates communication with an IP in CO (128.241.20.244) src ports vary, from 2743 up to 2844; dest port is 443. Each "burst" is around 12 to 16 (e.g., packets A -> B = 7, packets B -> A = 7) total packets. The connections are brief.

I did the capture because I started getting bounced emails, returned "for abuse", from all of my email addresses. I then realized my IP was on 21 blacklists. I also noticed returned emails I know I never sent that were "Canadian Pharmacy" stuff. I suspected peacomm or a variant and proceeded to run every possible tool, rootkit detection tool you can imagine. I am a network engineer, my spouse is a CISSP anti-virus security professional so we know a thing or two about this, but cannot find definitive evidence of an exploit, rootkit or malware infection. I never open spam, but I did have an old version of java (ironically, for a work app) that could have been compromised.

Are we chasing our tails here? We didn't see anything in "hijack this" logs worth noting. We have run the following:

Housecall.trendmicro
symantec sav11
trojan hunter
f-secure blacklight
windows malicious softare removal tool
rootkit revealer
sypbot s&d
gmer
icesword
hook analyser 3.02
panda anti-rookkit
adaware 2007

We ran many of these in safe mode. I am going to run from xp cd recovery console tonight. I would just blow it away but am curious, and also embarrassed, that with our combined skill sets we cannot nail this down. Any feedback would sure be appreciated.

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
MAPKOBKA

Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Premium Member

Joined: Jul 04, 2007
Posts: 163

Premium

PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 8:41 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Running different utils in the hope of catching an infection is not really enough these days. One needs an experienced malware fighter that can make sense of the logs and pick up on any suspicious values. For example, I recently discovered a malware sample that was not being detected by any of the major scanners, and I only found it after sifting through a couple of pages of different logs (combofix, sdfix, hijackthis etc)

I am sure that the folks over at the HiJackThis section will be glad to help and analyse some of the extended logs for suspicious files.

If you want to try going down that route before nuking the drive I suggest you read this:

CastleCops Link/t102301-Hijackthis_Guidelines_Read_Before_Posting.html


_________________
Kaspersky Lab Forum Moderator
KL Cert PSP
Virusinfo.info External Specialist
Alliance of Security Analysis Professionals Member
http://malwarecrawler.com - honeypot@malwarecrawler.com
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
computerbrainz

Trooper
Trooper


Joined: Jan 28, 2008
Posts: 21
Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 8:58 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

zoney,

What software and OS are you currently running?

If you are getting these emails, there may be a 'door' open somewhere....someone's getting in and out randomly.

I learned that malicious hackers are very smart....teamwork is the key to nailing these dudes..


_________________
My mind is of the ultimate...
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
zoney

Cadet
Cadet


Joined: Mar 07, 2008
Posts: 6
Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 9:10 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

It's xp sp2, totally patched. I've also used a lot of sysinternals tools, wolfe, done netstat in verbose mode and so forth. I've got two hijack logs, one of which is "clean" (followed the instructions on castlecop to turn off some realtime stuff like teatimer and sav liveupdate etc) which I can post but nothing really stood out and caught our eye.

One thing I forgot to mention-- I could not get windows defender to install, and my better half just informed me that we couldn't get rootrevealer or iscesword to run right. Tonight we'll try from booting the CD and doing more diags but maybe I will post my hijack log... I know, doctors are the worst patients right?

Appreciate the help guys...

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
computerbrainz

Trooper
Trooper


Joined: Jan 28, 2008
Posts: 21
Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 9:23 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

hmm..what name does that IP resolve to...

A suggesstion would be to place the resolved name in your hosts file and see what happens since it's outbound traffic...you cut off the inbound traffic and whatever is communicating has nowhere to go.

127.0.0.1 (Resolved name)

..most apps use that file for communication..or check your hosts file altogether to see if there are any malicious IP's and sites there.


_________________
My mind is of the ultimate...
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
zoney

Cadet
Cadet


Joined: Mar 07, 2008
Posts: 6
Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 9:55 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Yeah, the only stuff in the host file was what spybot puts in there, all the loopback address entries it adds.

Here's the ARIN on that IP...

OrgName: NTT America, Inc.
OrgID: NTTAM-1
Address: 8005 South Chester Street
Address: Suite 200
City: Centennial
StateProv: CO
PostalCode: 80112
Country: US

CIDR: 128.241.0.0/16
NetName: NTTA-128-241
NetHandle: NET-128-241-0-0-1
Parent: NET-128-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Allocation
NameServer: AUTH21.NS.GIN.NTT.NET
NameServer: AUTH22.NS.GIN.NTT.NET
NameServer: AUTH23.NS.GIN.NTT.NET
NameServer: AUTH24.NS.GIN.NTT.NET
NameServer: AUTH25.NS.GIN.NTT.NET


Guess it was rude to post the IP, I should have only posted the CIDR, it could be another victim/peer bot, but then it could be a mothership. I was able to tracert to it at the time, but haven't tried recently. The other odd thing in those packets, following the TCP stream (what ascii I was able to make out anyway), was that there were things in it like:

".....0..1.0...U....--1.0...U....SomeState1.0...U....SomeCity1.0...U.
..SomeOrganization1.0...U....SomeOrganizationalUnit1.0...U....localhost.localdomain1)0'..*.H..
.....root@localhost.localdomain0..
070913150135Z.
080912150135Z0..1.0...U....--1.0...U....SomeState1.0...U....SomeCity1.0...U.
..SomeOrganization1.0...U....SomeOrganizationalUnit1.0...U....localhost.localdomain1)0'..*.H..
.....root@localhost.localdomain0..0"

Most legit stuff has identifying info in it, like live update, windows update traffic etc. Of course it was mostly encrypted so who knows what the deal is?

The next night I ran wireshark offline and noticed my PC sending out ICMP packets, but maybe that is normal. Just don't want to be used as a reverse proxy or spam bot or anything.

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
zoney

Cadet
Cadet


Joined: Mar 07, 2008
Posts: 6
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 2:15 am    Post subject: update
Reply with quote

Wireshark captured this activity tonight, the computer was idle. I thought I'd run it before reposting a clean hijack post.

This looks like fast flux to me, anyone else concur? Could it be evidence of a peacomm variant?

========
GET /tools/swg2/update?auv=1&r=2&up=30&p=w&ma=5&mi=1&b=2600&sp=ServicePack2&as=swg&pv=1.2.1128.5462&hl=en&os=win&ds=1&dsc1=0 HTTP/1.1Accept: text/*, application/octet-stream
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; Win32)Host:www.google.com
Cache-Control: no-cacheCookie: PREF=ID=3a1ec7a21eed1bd6:TB=2:TM=1096741693:LM=1191029313:C2COFF=1:S=RZ1mm-3ZpamL4jzq; testcookie=HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/plainTransfer-Encoding: chunkedExpires: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 00:29:20 GMT
Cache-Control: private, max-age=0
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 00:29:20 GMTServer: GFE/1.3a0version: 0.0.0.0
url: http://dl.google.com/swg/0.0.0.0/wontdownload
launch-action: execute
launch-target: nofile.exe
signature: 4444
rlz: 1R1_____enUS2650

GET /tools/swg2/update?auv=1&r=2&up=30&p=w&ma=5&mi=1&b=2600&sp=ServicePack2&as=swg&pv=1.2.1128.5462&hl=en&os=win&ds=1&dsc1=0 HTTP/1.1Accept: text/*, application/octet-streamUser-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; Win32)Host: www.google.com
Cache-Control: no-cacheCookie: PREF=ID=3a1ec7a21eed1bd6:TB=2:TM=1096741693:LM=1191029313:C2COFF=1:S=RZ1mm-3ZpamL4jzq; testcookie=HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/plainTransfer-Encoding: chunked
Expires: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 00:29:20 GMT
Cache-Control: private, max-age=0
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 00:29:20 GMT
Server: GFE/1.3a0version: 0.0.0.0url: http://dl.google.com/swg/0.0.0.0/wontdownload
launch-action: execute
launch-target: nofile.exe
signature: 4444
rlz: 1R1_____enUS2650


.............www.google.com..................www.google.com..............r...www.l...,...........U.c.,...........U.g.,...........U.h.,...........U..y............99.154.85.209.in-addr.arpa.....y............99.154.85.209.in-addr.arpa.............*0.0.ns1.google.com..dns-admin.<w.....T`......u...*0J............254.2.168.192.in-addr.arpa.....J............254.2.168.192.in-addr.arpa................A.prisoner.iana.org.
hostmaster.root-servers.FwT............:...:..............1.112.193.10.in-addr.arpa..................1.112.193.10.in-addr.arpa................A.prisoner.iana.org.
hostmaster.root-servers.EwT............:...:.0............145.2.28.172.in-addr.arpa.....0............145.2.28.172.in-addr.arpa..............,.A.prisoner.iana.org.
hostmaster.root-servers.EwT............:...:..............5.98.116.12.in-addr.arpa..................5.98.116.12.in-addr.arpa................K.cbru.br.ns.els-gms.att.net.
rm-hostmaster.ems.att.com....'..Q...'...'..................201.16.123.12.in-addr.arpa..................201.16.123.12.in-addr.arpa..............,...ggr3.dlstx.ip.att.net..............138.34.205.192.in-addr.arpa..................138.34.205.192.in-addr.arpa..................att-gw.dallas.level3.net..............62.19.68.4.in-addr.arpa..................62.19.68.4.in-addr.arpa................ .vlan69.csw1.Dallas1.Level3.net..............137.136.69.4.in-addr.arpa..................137.136.69.4.in-addr.arpa.............Q..".ae-62-62.ebr2.Dallas1.Level3.net..............105.132.69.4.in-addr.arpa..................105.132.69.4.in-addr.arpa.............Q....ae-2.ebr1.Denver1.Level3.net..............38.132.69.4.in-addr.arpa..................38.132.69.4.in-addr.arpa.............Q..".ae-1-100.ebr2.Denver1.Level3.net.o............99.165.85.209.in-addr.arpa.....o............99.165.85.209.in-addr.arpa.............d....eo-in-f99.google.com..............254.2.168.192.in-addr.arpa..................254.2.168.192.in-addr.arpa..............k.A.prisoner.iana.org.
hostmaster.root-servers.FwT............:...:..............1.112.193.10.in-addr.arpa..................1.112.193.10.in-addr.arpa................A.prisoner.iana.org.
hostmaster.root-servers.EwT............:...:..............145.2.28.172.in-addr.arpa..................145.2.28.172.in-addr.arpa................A.prisoner.iana.org.
hostmaster.root-servers.EwT............:...:.L............145.25.171.205.in-addr.arpa.....L............145.25.171.205.in-addr.arpa..............s...dal-core-01.inet.qwest.net..............14.14.14.67.in-addr.arpa..................14.14.14.67.in-addr.arpa.............Q....atl-core-02.inet.qwest.net..............166.21.171.205.in-addr.arpa..................166.21.171.205.in-addr.arpa.............Q....atl-edge-18.inet.qwest.net..............6.1.144.63.in-addr.arpa..................6.1.144.63.in-addr.arpa.............*0.C
svl-ans-01.inet.qwest.net..dns-admin.qwestip.Kw.....*0......:...Q.#............84.174.233.64.in-addr.arpa.....#............84.174.233.64.in-addr.arpa.............*0.0.ns1.google.com..dns-admin.<w..4..T`..........Q.2............1.47.239.216.in-addr.arpa.....2............1.47.239.216.in-addr.arpa.............*0.0.ns1.google.com..dns-admin.;w..4..T`..........Q..............138.43.239.216.in-addr.arpa..................138.43.239.216.in-addr.arpa.............*0.0.ns1.google.com..dns-admin.=w..4..T`..........Q.

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
tetak

MIRT Team Lead
Premium Member

Joined: Jan 19, 2007
Posts: 5869

MIRT Premium

PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:46 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

swg, google... have you got the google toolbar installed? Could it be that checking for updates?

Have you got anything else from google installed?


_________________
Got Windows XP? Help protect your PC from malware with Microsofts anti-spyware program Windows Defender.

Download it for free from http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/spyware/software/default.mspx
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
zoney

Cadet
Cadet


Joined: Mar 07, 2008
Posts: 6
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:45 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Yeah, you're probably right. I read somewhere that peacomm tried to resolve google so I thought that what it was.

I am putting the cart in front of the horse. I did my clean hijack and am going to post it on the hijackthis board, I don't want to waste anyone's time.

Thanks everyone, hope someone can see something in my log.

Zoney

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
gmax_at

Cadet
Cadet


Joined: Apr 18, 2008
Posts: 1
Location: Russia

PostPosted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 2:51 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Hi, Zoney,

do you have an update of the status of your case. I just checked the log of my home box and got the same cap data.

Regards.

gmax

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
tommyd

Guest
IP: 75.144.*.*






PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 4:22 pm    Post subject: Same Issue
Reply with quote

I have the same issue. Mine pings that ip via ssl and up to 3 others, and then sends spam. Some research turned up ozdok as on spambot that uses ssl as the control channel.

On my system it's windows server 2003, with 10 svchosts runing, 6 logged in as "system" and 2 in as Network Service, 2 in as Local Service.

Back to top
maliciousbrains

Sergeant
Sergeant
Premium Member

Joined: Feb 23, 2008
Posts: 103

Premium

PostPosted: Thu May 01, 2008 4:23 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Can u check your DNS settings. These can happen when ur using an unregistered domain name as ur DNS Zone.

From the below log:

Quote:

......254.2.168.192.in-addr.arpa..............k.A.prisoner.iana.org.
hostmaster.root-servers.FwT............:...:..............
1.112.193.10.in-addr.arpa..................
1.112.193.10.in-addr.arpa................A.prisoner.iana.org.


I can see that its trying to communicate with prisoner.iana.org. Its one of the so called blackhole servers.

These kind of communications happen cus at times there are stray bogus packets which ur client maybe picking and hence those strange communications...

There maybe misconfiguration in your network.

That was just a possibility but check the DNS Settings properly and if there is an ISP involved its better you discuss the issue with them as well.


_________________
.:: Malicious Brains ::.
http://www.malwareinfo.org
http://blog.malwareinfo.org
http://forum.malwareinfo.org

There are no patches or service packs for ignorance!
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
timisw

Cadet
Cadet


Joined: Jun 21, 2008
Posts: 4
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 2:26 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

I am having the same issues to the same IP address.

I did have an infection that I posted on here last week. I seemed to have gotten rid of it. I was on the road for two weeks. HiJackThis and SecurityTaskManager look good.

When it was sending emails out at the cyclic rate, Symantec Corporate was popping up for each one. Looking at wireshark, nothing was really in the emails.

Netstat shows no connections when communicating to 128.241.20.244. At one point, it looked like one of hte connection was using a PID of 0?

I am about ready to wax this thing. But would like to figure out what is going on as more of a learning experience.

Let me know if anyone wants to help me engage and I will provide whatever is needed.

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
PeterDuncan

Cadet
Cadet


Joined: Oct 19, 2008
Posts: 1
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 4:01 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

I believe it's RUbotted (beta) from Trend Micro that is communicating with 128.241.20.244.

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic       All -> FavForums -> MIRT Discussion All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Quick Reply:
Username: 

Quote the last message
Attach signature (signatures can be changed in profile)
 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
spacer spacer