| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Paul
CastleCops Founder
 Joined: Feb 22, 2002 Posts: 27351
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:57 am Post subject: Footer line |
|
|
Has been seriously cropped... Pages served has been switched from 5 minute intervals to pages per minute (ppm).
ie:
306ppm 0.607s
The second part is how long the page took to render.
Engine copyrights have been moved into a new link. I sent an email to the nuke author on this too.
/modules.php?name=Powered _________________ Paul Laudanski - http://www.laudanski.com
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/49a/17b
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Blast
General
 Premium Member
 Joined: Sep 20, 2003 Posts: 5469
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Paul,
Did the footer lines take up that much width to affect the speed demon inside you?
I'm interested to hear why they would be eating up so much?
cheers... _________________ Blast aka Bill Gray
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ikeb
Special Response Team Forums Admin
 Joined: Apr 20, 2003 Posts: 16536
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 12:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
191ppm 0.320s for this page. Why would ppm and pg render time both go down? Shouldn't ppm go up as pg render time goes down?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul
CastleCops Founder
 Joined: Feb 22, 2002 Posts: 27351
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Its not so much a performance boost reason, just trying to perpare the site for a tighter look.
As for the ppm, the numbers would decrease because the timescale went from 5 minutes to 1 minute.
Take 200 pages per minute and extrapolate to 5 minutes... that's 1000 pages served. Those are the numbers we have been used to seeing, and still see, but in one minute intervals now. _________________ Paul Laudanski - http://www.laudanski.com
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/49a/17b
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul
CastleCops Founder
 Joined: Feb 22, 2002 Posts: 27351
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BTW, I received a reply email from the author telling me its OK to migrate the footer credits to the engine module:
Jul 5, 2004 @ 10:04PM
| Quote: | Hello Paul...
The module is ok.
Best Regards!
Francisco Burzi |
So just in case any open source folks question why we have it moved, it is because the author himself OK'd it. _________________ Paul Laudanski - http://www.laudanski.com
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/49a/17b
Last edited by Paul on Fri May 13, 2005 7:21 pm, edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Blast
General
 Premium Member
 Joined: Sep 20, 2003 Posts: 5469
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't have much doubt about that... call it a return on services due (hehe) _________________ Blast aka Bill Gray
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ikeb
Special Response Team Forums Admin
 Joined: Apr 20, 2003 Posts: 16536
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 2:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
OK thks for the background. However I'm observing that the ppm goes up as the render time goes up. I would have thought that the two parameters should have an inverse relationship. 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul
CastleCops Founder
 Joined: Feb 22, 2002 Posts: 27351
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ikeb
Special Response Team Forums Admin
 Joined: Apr 20, 2003 Posts: 16536
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If I understand this correctly, ppm is "pages per minute". Thus number of pages rendered should go up as render time for each page goes down (or vis versa). In other words as the time taken per page goes down, the number of pages rendered should go up.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul
CastleCops Founder
 Joined: Feb 22, 2002 Posts: 27351
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ikeb
Special Response Team Forums Admin
 Joined: Apr 20, 2003 Posts: 16536
|
Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 5:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
OK, I guess there's more that goes into ppm and pg render time that I don't know about. It just seemed logical that if the time to render a page goes up that fewer pages can be rendered in any given time frame.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul
CastleCops Founder
 Joined: Feb 22, 2002 Posts: 27351
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|