CastleCops, Internet Crime Fighters
Need help? Click here to register for free! Absolutely zero advertisements on this site!

Donation/Premium
spacer
block bottom
Security Central
spacer
· Home
· PIRT/Fried Phish
· MIRT
· SIRT
· Deutsch
· Wiki
· Newsletter
· O16/ActiveX
· CLSID List
· Contest2007
· Downloads
· Feedback (send)
· Forums
· HijackThis
· Hijacktrend
· LSPs
· My Downloads
· O18
· O20
· O21
· O22
· O23
· O9
· Premium
· Private Messages
· Proxomitron
· Reviews
· Search
· StartupList
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· WsIRT
· Your Account
· Acceptable Use Policy
block bottom
spacer spacer

Footer line

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic       All -> FavForums -> General Site [del.icio.us!] [digg it!] [reddit!]
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Paul

CastleCops Founder


Joined: Feb 22, 2002
Posts: 27351

Administrators Firetrust Forums Admin MIRT Moderators MVP Phishing Squad Premium Team CC Committee

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:57 am    Post subject: Footer line
Reply with quote

Has been seriously cropped... Pages served has been switched from 5 minute intervals to pages per minute (ppm).

ie:

306ppm 0.607s

The second part is how long the page took to render.

Engine copyrights have been moved into a new link. I sent an email to the nuke author on this too.

CastleCops Link/modules.php?name=Powered


_________________
Paul Laudanski - http://www.laudanski.com
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/49a/17b
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Send email Visit posters website
Blast

General
General
Premium Member

Joined: Sep 20, 2003
Posts: 5469

Premium Team F@H

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 12:26 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Hi Paul,

Did the footer lines take up that much width to affect the speed demon inside you?

I'm interested to hear why they would be eating up so much?

cheers...


_________________
Blast aka Bill Gray
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Send email Visit posters website
Ikeb

Special Response Team
Forums Admin

Joined: Apr 20, 2003
Posts: 16536

Forums Admin Moderators MVP Premium SRT Team CC Committee Team F@H

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 12:44 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

191ppm 0.320s for this page. Why would ppm and pg render time both go down? Shouldn't ppm go up as pg render time goes down?

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
Paul

CastleCops Founder


Joined: Feb 22, 2002
Posts: 27351

Administrators Firetrust Forums Admin MIRT Moderators MVP Phishing Squad Premium Team CC Committee

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:41 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Its not so much a performance boost reason, just trying to perpare the site for a tighter look.

As for the ppm, the numbers would decrease because the timescale went from 5 minutes to 1 minute.

Take 200 pages per minute and extrapolate to 5 minutes... that's 1000 pages served. Those are the numbers we have been used to seeing, and still see, but in one minute intervals now.


_________________
Paul Laudanski - http://www.laudanski.com
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/49a/17b
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Send email Visit posters website
Paul

CastleCops Founder


Joined: Feb 22, 2002
Posts: 27351

Administrators Firetrust Forums Admin MIRT Moderators MVP Phishing Squad Premium Team CC Committee

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:50 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

BTW, I received a reply email from the author telling me its OK to migrate the footer credits to the engine module:

Jul 5, 2004 @ 10:04PM

Quote:
Hello Paul...

The module is ok.

Best Regards!

Francisco Burzi


So just in case any open source folks question why we have it moved, it is because the author himself OK'd it.


_________________
Paul Laudanski - http://www.laudanski.com
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/49a/17b


Last edited by Paul on Fri May 13, 2005 7:21 pm, edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Send email Visit posters website
Blast

General
General
Premium Member

Joined: Sep 20, 2003
Posts: 5469

Premium Team F@H

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 8:09 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

I didn't have much doubt about that... call it a return on services due (hehe)


_________________
Blast aka Bill Gray
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Send email Visit posters website
Ikeb

Special Response Team
Forums Admin

Joined: Apr 20, 2003
Posts: 16536

Forums Admin Moderators MVP Premium SRT Team CC Committee Team F@H

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 2:02 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

OK thks for the background. However I'm observing that the ppm goes up as the render time goes up. I would have thought that the two parameters should have an inverse relationship. Confused

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
Paul

CastleCops Founder


Joined: Feb 22, 2002
Posts: 27351

Administrators Firetrust Forums Admin MIRT Moderators MVP Phishing Squad Premium Team CC Committee

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 3:01 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

I'm not following your train of thought on that. Not sure why the two would be inversely proportional?


_________________
Paul Laudanski - http://www.laudanski.com
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/49a/17b
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Send email Visit posters website
Ikeb

Special Response Team
Forums Admin

Joined: Apr 20, 2003
Posts: 16536

Forums Admin Moderators MVP Premium SRT Team CC Committee Team F@H

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 1:27 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

If I understand this correctly, ppm is "pages per minute". Thus number of pages rendered should go up as render time for each page goes down (or vis versa). In other words as the time taken per page goes down, the number of pages rendered should go up.

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
Paul

CastleCops Founder


Joined: Feb 22, 2002
Posts: 27351

Administrators Firetrust Forums Admin MIRT Moderators MVP Phishing Squad Premium Team CC Committee

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 2:38 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

I'm lost. I don't understand why that would be the case.


_________________
Paul Laudanski - http://www.laudanski.com
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/49a/17b
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Send email Visit posters website
Ikeb

Special Response Team
Forums Admin

Joined: Apr 20, 2003
Posts: 16536

Forums Admin Moderators MVP Premium SRT Team CC Committee Team F@H

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 5:12 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

OK, I guess there's more that goes into ppm and pg render time that I don't know about. It just seemed logical that if the time to render a page goes up that fewer pages can be rendered in any given time frame.

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
Paul

CastleCops Founder


Joined: Feb 22, 2002
Posts: 27351

Administrators Firetrust Forums Admin MIRT Moderators MVP Phishing Squad Premium Team CC Committee

PostPosted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 12:46 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Ohhh... I see what you're saying. That'd be basically right but in this case the render time takes network latency into account.


_________________
Paul Laudanski - http://www.laudanski.com
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/49a/17b
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Send email Visit posters website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic       All -> FavForums -> General Site All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Quick Reply:
Username: 

Quote the last message
Attach signature (signatures can be changed in profile)
 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
spacer spacer