CastleCops, Internet Crime Fighters
Need help? Click here to register for free! Absolutely zero advertisements on this site!

Donation/Premium
spacer
block bottom
Security Central
spacer
· Home
· PIRT/Fried Phish
· MIRT
· SIRT
· Deutsch
· Wiki
· Newsletter
· O16/ActiveX
· CLSID List
· Contest2007
· Downloads
· Feedback (send)
· Forums
· HijackThis
· Hijacktrend
· LSPs
· My Downloads
· O18
· O20
· O21
· O22
· O23
· O9
· Premium
· Private Messages
· Proxomitron
· Reviews
· Search
· StartupList
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· WsIRT
· Your Account
· Acceptable Use Policy
block bottom
spacer spacer

We're not in Kansas anymore, Toto

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic       All -> FavForums -> Internet Connectivity [del.icio.us!] [digg it!] [reddit!]
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Oldfrog

Special Response Team


Joined: Jun 27, 2004
Posts: 8576
Location: Deep in the Heart of Texas
Moderators MVP Premium SRT

PostPosted: Fri Jul 16, 2004 4:44 pm    Post subject: We're not in Kansas anymore, Toto
Reply with quote

Like a lot of people my home network wasn't really planned, it just happened. Two PC's, a hub, a network. Then came connections for a couple of laptops and an old X-Window work station and the hub was full. All of this was in one room, internet connectivity came from ICS on the main PC, and security was not a significant issue. When I decided to implement a wireless network that all changed and a lot about the net had to change too. The following outlines the steps that I took to ensure that the new network was secure.

Changes to the Basic Net

1) Network name: Yeah, when I started out I just left the default 'Mshome' as the net name. This was the first change. What you change it to doesn't matter a great deal as long as you are NOT using the same one as 99% of the other home networks in the world.

2) IP Addresses: I am also guessing that 99% of the home networks in the world start their addressing with 192.168.0.1 with subnet 255.255.255.0. I decided on an address field of 32 ID's so selected a subnet mask of 255.255.255.224 (I specifically wanted a mask that was not comprised of full and empty octets). I also did not want a network address that ended in 0 so selected 192.168.1.64 as the network ID. I set aside the addresses in the .65 to .69 range for network hardware, .70 to .79 for static IP's on wired systems, and .80 to .89 for wireless DHCP.

Once the wired network was reconfigured, working, and tested I proceeded to the wireless implementation.

Wireless Configuration:

1) Password: Every Linksys router made is shipped with a default password of "admin" and every hacker in the world knows it. I have been lax about using strong passwords for stuff around the house that no one else has access to but wireless is a whole new game and I highly recommend them in this situation.

2) SSID: Every wireless router comes with a default SSID or network name. Every hacker in the world knows all the default names. Changing it is a no-brainer, it has to be done. I made mine the same as the name of my wired net but you can use whatever you like as long as it is not the default.

3) SSID Broadcasting: Now that I had a new name I didn't want to tell anybody what it was. My router came with broadcasting enabled. What this does is advertises your wireless net to anyone who might be in the area. It's a simple matter to turn it off.

4) MAC Address Filtering: This feature allows you to control which particular wireless NIC's are allowed to join the network. I use it. Every time that I buy a wireless device I register the MAC with the access point. I don't find it a great bother. This ensures that only those devices can actually connect to my net.

5) Encryption: At this point I had a network with a hidden name, a strong administrative password, and a list of authorized systems. That still doesn't stop someone from detecting the presence of the network and sniffing the packets that flow back forth as RF signals. My router supports four different encryption methods and I chose WEP with 128 bit key as the most secure.

After doing all of that I did go back to the individual systems and review the files and folders that were being shared and added password protection to a number of them individually. So far, so good.

Back to top
View users profile Send private message Send email Visit posters website MSN Messenger
whatsupdeano
Warnings : 1

Cadet
Cadet


Joined: Mar 15, 2005
Posts: 4
Location: UK

PostPosted: Sun Apr 03, 2005 10:11 am    Post subject: Toto do they have WPA in Kansas?
Reply with quote

Just wanted to say that this was a great article and thought that I might add my two pence worth as well!

I'm not sure if the Linksys router supports it but the best Wireless Security that you could use at the current time would be WPA in a home environment!

It may be possible on your Linksys router to enable it but if there is no option for it, you may be able to get this security feature by updating the firmware on your Wireless router.

WPA provides better security then WEP because it uses a pre shared key which changes on a regular basis, thus preventing the password from being hacked! The WEP key's do not change and so it is much easier for a determined hacker to gain access to your password and your network!

It's also worth noting that using MAC Access Control lists only prevents users from physically getting onto the Wireless Network it does not prevent your data travelling accross your wireless network from being sniffed. For this reason it is best to use a combination of both MAC filtering and one of the Wireless encryption protocols.


_________________
Dean Bantleman
Author of Wireless Networks Exposed
http://www.wirelessxposed.com
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Send email Visit posters website
ahoier

SIRT Handler


Joined: Jan 14, 2006
Posts: 1087
Location: USA

PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:12 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

WEP keys are broadcasted in clear view from what I've read, so that's a no-no Smile

Of course, your 70 year old neighbor may not know how to get around that....but their grand kids MIGHT Smile

About the SSID broadcasting, I dont know if it's a Windows muck-up, or Linksys....but I couldn't get it to work, to turn off SSID broadcasting; because my Windows machines couldn't connect to the router.

MAC Filtering, though sounds fancy, I heard it's also a no-brainer to "crack"/sniff.

Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Meman5150

Guest
IP: 75.0.*.*






PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 12:10 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

In regards to what ahoier said. It is true, you can sniff the packets to find the MAC addresses of the devices and clone them. Wireless is not secure at all. Mad

Back to top
Bill_Bright

General
General
Premium Member

Joined: Jan 16, 2004
Posts: 9036
Location: Nebraska, USA
MVP Premium

PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:50 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Meman5150 wrote:
It is true, you can sniff the packets to find the MAC addresses of the devices and clone them. Wireless is not secure at all. Mad
A bad guy can break into your house, tap into your Ethernet and have fun on your wired network too.

I happen to agree with you BTW, wireless out-of-the-box is not secure. But it can be made very secure using OF's suggestions as a guideline - they are easy steps users can take now to minimize risks.

Will they eliminate all risks? Of course not. But locks are to keep honest people honest. If a bad guy wants in, he's coming in - depending on his tools and skills - and demeanor. But like all bad guys (except for the pure pros) they seek opportunities for easy pickings. Keep your garage door open at night with no lights, and someone is going to see that as easy pickings. Keep the door closed, locked and well lit, 99.9% of the badguys are going to move on. They certainly are not going to park in a strange car out front and point an antenna at you or your neighbor's house without attracting unwanted attention.

Also, it is important to note that other factors besides settings affect WiFi security and capabilities. If you live in an apartment complex where you have the potential for dozens of WiFi networks within antenna reach, that's a problem - you could have a badguy 6ft away through a single wall or floor. Microwaves and wireless phone systems don't always play well with WiFi networks either - though not really a security issue. So I do not recommend wireless for apartments - for both security and network reliability/interference issues. Sadly, most apartment owners don't like tenants running Ethernet wires through the walls, so WiFi becomes the only alternative. Sad

For folks that live in a house, with surrounding yards (distance) between the neighbors, however, a WiFi network may be the best bet. The irony is the suburban home dweller IS probably in a better position to wire the house through walls, floors, and ceilings with good Cat5e or Cat6 and have a 10/100/1000 Mb network.

And, for anyone who is too relaxed about taking a disciplined approach with security, I don't recommend wireless for them either, no matter where they live.


_________________
image Bill, AFE7Ret
Freedom is NOT Free!

image
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic       All -> FavForums -> Internet Connectivity All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Quick Reply:
Username: 

Quote the last message
Attach signature (signatures can be changed in profile)
 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
spacer spacer