CastleCops, Internet Crime Fighters
Need help? Click here to register for free! Absolutely zero advertisements on this site!

Donation/Premium
spacer
block bottom
Security Central
spacer
· Home
· PIRT/Fried Phish
· MIRT
· SIRT
· Deutsch
· Wiki
· Newsletter
· O16/ActiveX
· CLSID List
· Contest2007
· Downloads
· Feedback (send)
· Forums
· HijackThis
· Hijacktrend
· LSPs
· My Downloads
· O18
· O20
· O21
· O22
· O23
· O9
· Premium
· Private Messages
· Proxomitron
· Reviews
· Search
· StartupList
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· WsIRT
· Your Account
· Acceptable Use Policy
block bottom
spacer spacer

Google search malware attack in progress
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic       All -> FavForums -> Security [del.icio.us!] [digg it!] [reddit!]
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ErikAlbert
Warnings : 3

Captain
Captain


Joined: Jan 20, 2005
Posts: 424


PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 5:35 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

mechBgon wrote:
Well, hopefully their secret feeds eventually tip them off that IEDefender shouldn't get a green checkmark Wink
The nature of the Google malware threat being discussed here seems likely to be one of those quickly-shifting targets that SiteAdvisor will not be effective against. Wink


The same argument can be used against the deployment of hosts files for security purposes. Do you by any chance recommend that?

Back to top
View users profile Send private message
tembow

Blue Angel
Premium Member

Joined: Oct 10, 2005
Posts: 2933

Blue Security Premium

PostPosted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:13 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

mechBgon wrote:
Well, hopefully their secret feeds eventually tip them off that IEDefender shouldn't get a green checkmark Wink I could go back through my SA post history and pull up more doozies. I also have observed that the bad guys cycle through new bad IPs and domains fast enough that SA seems unable to react. When dean, myself and Patrick Jordan combined cannot get a site rated RED... well, whatever.

The nature of the Google malware threat being discussed here seems likely to be one of those quickly-shifting targets that SiteAdvisor will not be effective against. That's my prediction, and I guess time will tell whether it's accurate. Just glancing at my last SA reports... point in case.


If you check that site you will find it is a parked domain, which SiteAdvisor correctly rates as harmless, along with its co-conspirators with those oh so interesting names on the same IP

ymct-aaqada.com
ueornaaqada.com
ymctaaqada.com
aaqada-ueorn.com
aaqadaueorn.com
f7.thezirius.com
aaqada-ymct.com

But I concede your point that SA needs to be faster and more reactive. Legal forces can be such a drag . . . Sad
Quote:

mechBgon, 9/9 @ 893, 12th worldwide (reputation)... declined the t-shirt Wink

9/9 @ 26K User Group coordinator

Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website AIM Address
AplusWebMaster

General
General


Joined: Mar 14, 2004
Posts: 4807
Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:49 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

FYI...

Malware Exploiting Death of Zoey Zane
- http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2007/12/malware-exploiting-death-of-zoey-zane.html
December 03, 2007- "From the sicko department . . . We have received multiple public reports of attackers using the recent murder of 18 year old college student Emily Sander (AKA "Zoey Zane" in the adult film industry world) as a lure to install malware.
From about.com:
'Dental records have confirmed that a body found near a Kansas highway is missing community college student and Internet porn star Emily Sander, authorities said. An autopsy has been completed, but the results have been sealed and are not available to the media . . . After Sander disappeared, it was discovered that the 18-year-old college student led a double life as "Zoey Zane," a character she played on Internet porn sites.'
Attackers have obtained very good search engine position when looking for information about “Zoey Zane”, and users may be lured into installing an “ActiveX upgrade” or “Flash Player” upgrade in order to view a video. In actuality, this “ActiveX video decoder” or “Flash Player Upgrade” is a Trojan that installs a Browser Helper Object (BHO) which produces fake pop-up messages and modifies search engine results in an attempt to install the Rogue Software IE Defender..."

(Screenshots available at the URL above.)

Shocked


_________________
AplusWebMaster
~ Are you up to date or vulnerable to Hackers? ...or both?
.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
mechBgon

Lieutenant
Lieutenant


Joined: May 13, 2007
Posts: 216

MVP

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:27 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

ErikAlbert wrote:
mechBgon wrote:
Well, hopefully their secret feeds eventually tip them off that IEDefender shouldn't get a green checkmark Wink
The nature of the Google malware threat being discussed here seems likely to be one of those quickly-shifting targets that SiteAdvisor will not be effective against. Wink


The same argument can be used against the deployment of hosts files for security purposes. Do you by any chance recommend that?


Because HOSTS files are a reactive measure, they have the same shortcoming we were discussing with regards to SiteAdvisor. They're never complete. I could see adding them as a "cherry on top" in combination with a great defense-in-depth strategy, but I sure wouldn't expect them to be a reliable ongoing defense against the malicious Google results being discussed in this thread. You can be sure the bad guys will play to their strengths, and agility is one of them.

Quote:
But I concede your point that SA needs to be faster and more reactive.


Do you know if they're planning to make any improvements in reaction time? I'm in a holding pattern; it seems like my efforts have been mostly fruitless because I'm focusing on threats whose lifecycles are shorter than SA's reaction time. It's a lot of hours to invest in that work if it's not going to actually help anyone.


_________________
Vista x64 · non-Admin account + Software Restriction Policy · Kaspersky AntiVirus 7 · Windows Firewall · full hardware DEP · 64-bit IE7 PM
Back to top
View users profile Send private message
AplusWebMaster

General
General


Joined: Mar 14, 2004
Posts: 4807
Location: USA

PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 4:29 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

FYI...

- http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSL191003420071219
Dec 19, 2007 - "Advertisements placed by Google in Web pages are being hijacked by so-called trojan software that replaces the intended text with ads from a different provider, Romanian antivirus company BitDefender says*. The trojan redirects queries meant to be sent to Google servers to a rogue server, which displays ads from a third party instead of ads from Google, BitDefender said in a statement... Google said on Wednesday: "We have cancelled customer accounts that display ads redirecting users to malicious sites or that advertise a product violating our software principles." "We actively work to detect and remove sites that serve malware in both our ad network and in our search results. We have manual and automated processes in place to detect and enforce these policies." The trojan, named after the mythic Trojan Horse because of its ability to enter computer systems undetected, attacks Google's AdSense service, which targets advertisements to match Web page content..."

* http://preview.tinyurl.com/2jp2k9
December 18, 2007 (Bitdefender) - "...The modified file contains a line redirecting the host "page2.googlesyndication.com" which should point to an IP of the form 6x.xxx.xxx.xxx to a different address, of the form 9x.xxx.xxx.xxx, so that the infected machines' browsers read ads from server at the replacement address rather than from Google..."

Shocked


_________________
AplusWebMaster
~ Are you up to date or vulnerable to Hackers? ...or both?
.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
tembow

Blue Angel
Premium Member

Joined: Oct 10, 2005
Posts: 2933

Blue Security Premium

PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:25 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Quote:
Do you know if they're planning to make any improvements in reaction time? I'm in a holding pattern; it seems like my efforts have been mostly fruitless because I'm focusing on threats whose lifecycles are shorter than SA's reaction time. It's a lot of hours to invest in that work if it's not going to actually help anyone.


If you are interested in a mechanised SA review posting system, PM me.

Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website AIM Address
AplusWebMaster

General
General


Joined: Mar 14, 2004
Posts: 4807
Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 11:30 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

More detail on the trojan-hijacker found at Google:

"...TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION:
Google Adsense is a service offered by Google which places advertisements in web pages. The advertisements are targeted (meaning that they are in concordance with the topic of the webpage), making them more effective..."
- http://www.bitdefender.com/VIRUS-1000239-en--Trojan.Qhost.WU.html
Discovered: 2007 Dec 17 - "...SYMPTOMS:
* The pages which normally contain advertisement from Google either don't display the advertisement or display advertisement from an other source (not Google)
* The "hosts" file used to provide a local storage for domain name / IP mappings contains a line redirecting the host "page2.googlesyndication.com"
To check if you are affected, you should issue the following command (from the command line or from Start -> Run):
ping -t pagead2.googlesyndication.com
The response should look similar to this:
Pinging pagead.l.google.com [6x.xxx.xxx.xxx] with 32 bytes of data:
where the x's represent digits. If you are not infected, the first digit will be a 6 (as in the example). If you are infected, the first digit will be a 9..."

.


_________________
AplusWebMaster
~ Are you up to date or vulnerable to Hackers? ...or both?
.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
AplusWebMaster

General
General


Joined: Mar 14, 2004
Posts: 4807
Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:23 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

FYI...

Fake codecs on Blogger
- http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2007/12/fake-codecs-on-blogger.html
December 26, 2007 - "Fake codec trojans (so-called “required” components to watch a video, but in fact are malicious trojans) are a plague on the Internet. We’ve written about them extensively. Often, they are seen in porn sites. However, by doing a few simple searches today, we can see that they’re available to those simply doing American football pools, checking bank hours or searching for New Year’s eve clipart. All of these are taking advantage of the free Blogger service... these sites are pushing real trojans. Please don’t go there if unless you know what you’re doing... I wouldn't put this in the same league as the massive Google poisoning we saw last month. That was an epic attack, using exploits and all kinds of nasty tricks. However, this is something to be aware of, and hopefully the good folks at Google will take them down lickety-split..."

(Screenshots available at the URL above.)

Shocked


_________________
AplusWebMaster
~ Are you up to date or vulnerable to Hackers? ...or both?
.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
AplusWebMaster

General
General


Joined: Mar 14, 2004
Posts: 4807
Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:34 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

FYI...

Malicious Code: Attackers Exploiting News of Benazir Bhutto Assassination
- http://www.websense.com/securitylabs/alerts/alert.php?AlertID=834
December 27, 2007 - "Websense Security Labs has discovered malicious Web sites attempting to capitalize on the breaking news of the assassination of Benazir Bhutto. These sites attempt to infect users seeking more information about the event. This activity is similar to past news events, where attackers used malicious sites containing information about the event to infect visitors. In this case, the first infected site found by Websense Security Labs was the second result in a Google search using a generic and simple keyword. Therefore, the site likely to receive large amounts of traffic. Clicking on the link in the search results did not trigger a warning from Google that the site may be malicious..."

(Screenshot available at the URL above.)

- http://blog.trendmicro.com/bhutto-assassination-javascripted/
December 27, 2007 - "...one of the sites in question indeed has an embedded malicious JavaScript redirect..."

Shocked


_________________
AplusWebMaster
~ Are you up to date or vulnerable to Hackers? ...or both?
.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
AplusWebMaster

General
General


Joined: Mar 14, 2004
Posts: 4807
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 1:37 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

FYI...

Attackers Abuse Google Blogger
Blogger is flooded with phony blogs – including some that inject malware
- http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=144171&print=true
JANUARY 25, 2008 - "Hackers are currently littering Google's Blogger site with phony blogs -- some containing malware, pornographic images, or pure spam. "Google Blogger is being used as a malware delivery mechanism," says Ken Steinberg, CTO and president of Savant Protection, who discovered the attack while working on his own blog this morning. The attackers apparently are automatically generating the blogs with scripts. The blogs come with nonsensical names and content that's obviously been generated using English-compliant engines and keyword focuses, he says. "They've upped the game. Mostly [blog attacks] have been through comments or postings," he says. Steinberg noted that some of the fake blogs were using malware-insertion techniques: "One of the more common ways of inserting malware is using overflow techniques found in movie [viewers]... When you click through a few of these blogs, up pops images set to auto-load -- some are images, some are movies" that can infect a visitor with malware, he says. Google says it's investigating the event..."

Shocked


_________________
AplusWebMaster
~ Are you up to date or vulnerable to Hackers? ...or both?
.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
AplusWebMaster

General
General


Joined: Mar 14, 2004
Posts: 4807
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 5:58 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

More detail... second source:

- http://preview.tinyurl.com/2v59aq
January 25, 2008 (Computerworld) - "...The spammers have borrowed other malware techniques, too. Just as some recent attacks have been launched using frequently changing JavaScript, the redirect code placed on the Google Pages or on blogs may fluctuate depending on the originating spam message. The scams are also using fast-flux techniques to rapidly change the resolving destinations of the links.."


Evil or Very Mad


_________________
AplusWebMaster
~ Are you up to date or vulnerable to Hackers? ...or both?
.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
AplusWebMaster

General
General


Joined: Mar 14, 2004
Posts: 4807
Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:21 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

FYI...

- http://blog.trendmicro.com/seo-manipulation-begins-for-super-bowl-malware-campaign/
January 24, 2008 - "Cyber criminals who took advantage of Hollywood actor Heath Ledger’s death* are at it again, this time attempting to lure unsuspecting Super Bowl fans. When users search for “Superbowl,” Google search results turn up the following (links to malware)... what’s interesting in this case is that the malicious URLs are once again found in the servers of the Czech hosting provider believed to be hacked. Our analysts have been in contact with CERT CZ and the Czech hosting provider but the malicious codes are still present as of this writing..."
* http://blog.trendmicro.com/compromised-sites-heath-it-up/

(Screenshots available at both URLs above.)

Evil or Very Mad


_________________
AplusWebMaster
~ Are you up to date or vulnerable to Hackers? ...or both?
.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
BobJam

Trooper
Trooper


Joined: Jan 16, 2008
Posts: 11
Location: Arizona, USA

PostPosted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:02 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

In my experience, newbies are the ones that are the most vulnerable to these Google search result exploits.

For experienced users, Site Advisor (though not perfect) and the caution gained from experience is usually enough to avoid these malware links.

But for newbies that may decide to search for a solution to some problem, in addition to trusting Site Advisor too much (if they even use it), they often are enticed by the link titles. For example, a lot of newbies look for Registry Cleaners, thinking that these things will solve their problems.

    <digression> Registry Cleaners are one of the most dangerous things for a newbie to try. Many of them create more problems than they are advertised to solve. Even an experienced user needs to exercise caution when using a legitimate Registry Cleaner. I don't use them myself. Anyway, Registry Cleaners are in abundance on the Internet. On another forum I visit (TSG), there are a lot of questions by newbies about "which is the best Registry Cleaner". Experienced users on that forum almost always respond "Stay away from Registry Cleaners unless you know what you're doing". <end digression>


Registry Cleaners, in my example, are one of the most common Google links that may harbor malicious code. Newbies are particularly attracted to them because they see the word "FREE".

And of course, there's the porn sites that offer to download fake ActiveX codecs to view a video. I'm not saying newbies are the most likely group to visit porn sites, but they are frequently disguised. For example, a newbie wanting to visit the WhiteHouse web site, may click on the Google link "Whitehouse.com". As I'm sure most of you know, the real Whitehouse web site is "Whitehouse.gov", and "Whitehouse.com" is a porn site. That's an example of a simple exploit of domain names that a newbie may not know.

So, IMHO, these malicious Google links attract mostly newbies. Shame on you if you are an experienced user and click on one.

(Off topic comment: I didn't change the font size midway through my post, nor did I bold code the first "I", and it didn't appear that way in the preview, but it comes up that way on the final submittal. Is there something wrong with the board software?? Or is it something I'm doing wrong??)


_________________
BJ

Use the most powerful Anti-Virus available - "Common Sense". It can be upgraded daily!

HP Pavilion ze4700 (laptop)
AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+ 1.8GHz
512MB RAM
XP HE SP2
IE7
120GB HDD
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
AplusWebMaster

General
General


Joined: Mar 14, 2004
Posts: 4807
Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:23 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Er, it appears you missed the reason for the reference post... we "more experienced" folks always avoid clicking on (what should be) the legitimate results of a search. You're kidding, right?


Question


_________________
AplusWebMaster
~ Are you up to date or vulnerable to Hackers? ...or both?
.
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
BobJam

Trooper
Trooper


Joined: Jan 16, 2008
Posts: 11
Location: Arizona, USA

PostPosted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:33 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Huh????

Don't understand your comment . . . guess I'm just dense this morning, but can you clarify??


_________________
BJ

Use the most powerful Anti-Virus available - "Common Sense". It can be upgraded daily!

HP Pavilion ze4700 (laptop)
AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+ 1.8GHz
512MB RAM
XP HE SP2
IE7
120GB HDD
Back to top
View users profile Send private message Visit posters website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic       All -> FavForums -> Security All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Quick Reply:
Username: 

Quote the last message
Attach signature (signatures can be changed in profile)
 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
spacer spacer