| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
seekaybee
SIRT Handler Premium Member
 Joined: Nov 14, 2007 Posts: 131
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 12:00 pm Post subject: SURBL-filtered registrars to add |
|
|
:sigh:
| Quote: | <abuse@planetdomain.com>:
202.131.95.8 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 550 Rejected, score=12.5 required=5.0 trigger=11.0, send abuse reports to abuse@planetdomain.com |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ahoier
SIRT Handler
 Joined: Jan 14, 2006 Posts: 1087 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They need to be educated. An abuse mailbox does not need filtering....
Try sending them a polite e-mail making this point. Ask them if there is a more-preferred address?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
seekaybee
SIRT Handler Premium Member
 Joined: Nov 14, 2007 Posts: 131
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi, ahoier. Not only does an abuse mailbox not need filtering, filtering renders the abuse mailbox just about useless.
I sent them an email (without a spam URI in the body) asking them to disable the filter on the abuse@ mailbox. Their autoreply informs you that a trouble ticket has been opened. So I just went ahead and submitted the original report directly at http://support.planetdomain.com/index.php
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
seekaybee
SIRT Handler Premium Member
 Joined: Nov 14, 2007 Posts: 131
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 1:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | PLANETDOMAIN PTY LTD.
Dear Registrar
This is a request for you to remove the spamvertized illegal domain odesblashik.com, and to remove the name server Address records for:
ns1.odesblashik.com [218.3.160.2]
ns2.odesblashik.com [218.3.160.2]
ns3.odesblashik.com [111.80.207.30]
|
| Quote: | Hello,
The domain name was placed on hold so it will no longer works. Same goes for the Child Dns servers.
Regards,
[removed]
Technical Support Team Leader
Planet Domain Pty Ltd |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
trobbins
SIRT Handler Premium Member
 Joined: Feb 19, 2007 Posts: 1176 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
At least after all that trouble, they suspended it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pwillener
SRT Trainee
 Premium Member
 Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 1813 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Another one
| Quote: | Subject: Undeliverable: Considered UNSOLICITED BULK EMAIL, apparently from you
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: Removal request: 25english.info
Sent: 2008-06-02 10:56
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
domains@blog.com on 2008-06-02 10:56
The recipient could not be processed because it would violate the security policy in force
< gollum.portugalmail.pt #5.7.0 smtp; 554 5.7.0 Reject, id=10658-01 - SPAM> |
I used online submission form at http://support.blog.com/index.php (Submit a Ticket)
P.S. neither of the tickets I have submitted since early this year has received any attention / reply / action.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jimVO
Lieutenant
 Premium Member
 Joined: Mar 17, 2008 Posts: 152 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
HICHINA is another one. I haven't been able to get a single complaint through to regadm@hichina.com in two days no matter what I do.
I finally tried to just use a SpamCop link and got this response:
Technical details of permanent failure:
PERM_FAILURE: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 553 553 This target address is not our MX service client. (state 14).
They seem to be trying hard not to get any complaints.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pwillener
SRT Trainee
 Premium Member
 Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 1813 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have no problems sending complaints to that address. Not so many, but so far all went through without a rejection.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jimVO
Lieutenant
 Premium Member
 Joined: Mar 17, 2008 Posts: 152 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, maybe they just don't like me. At first it was just delivery delays with a final rejection after 3 days. What kind of account are you using for your complaints? I'm using a GMail account. Do you include the spam body in the submission? Do you try and obfuscate the spammer URLs?
Thanks
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pwillener
SRT Trainee
 Premium Member
 Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 1813 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 1:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
I do not obfuscate domain names if not absolutely necessary; actually I only do it for BILT, but not HICHINA.
I do not include the original spam message (any more), but the Spamcop tracker.
I use a regular mail server to send my complaints, not Gmail or any other public mail service. Gmail / Yahoo / Hotmail may be blocked by some mail servers.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jimVO
Lieutenant
 Premium Member
 Joined: Mar 17, 2008 Posts: 152 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 3:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe the type of mailserver triggers a different set of filtering. I'll try not using one of the free emailers.
Thanks
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jimVO
Lieutenant
 Premium Member
 Joined: Mar 17, 2008 Posts: 152 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 7:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
I tried both just using Spamcop links and a non-free mail service but Hichina still rejects everything I try to send them.
Also most of my spam today has been registered with them and some nameservers as well.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pwillener
SRT Trainee
 Premium Member
 Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 1813 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
I sent a number of complaints to HICHINA today, and one was rejected. Resent it with munged domain name, but it was rejected again.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jimVO
Lieutenant
 Premium Member
 Joined: Mar 17, 2008 Posts: 152 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello tembow. I often get a series of delayed messages followed by a permanent failure.
I get the following response from regadm@hichina.com for pretty much anything I send:
spammed domain: braiuhcea.com
registrar: HICHINA WEB SOLUTIONS (HONG KONG) LIMITED
Response:
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
regadm@hichina.com
Technical details of permanent failure:
TEMP_FAILURE: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 451 451 SURBL filtered by multi.surbl.org (state 1 .
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pwillener
SRT Trainee
 Premium Member
 Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 1813 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
35 TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD
| Quote: | Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: Removal request: storerefer.com
Sent: 2008-07-03 15:41
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
liveperson@35.cn on 2008-07-03 15:41
There was a SMTP communication problem with the recipient's email server. Please contact your system administrator.
<em03.[munged].com #5.5.0 smtp;553 Email was rejected by 35 AntiSpam System, id=mx.35.cn.12498.1215066858> |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|