| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
!LordNykon
Cadet

 Joined: Apr 24, 2005 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 6:13 pm Post subject: No virtual memory? |
|
|
Hi ppl, i'm not sure if this is the right place to post this question, but there it goes:
I have 1024 MB of Ram, and i have tweaking programs that say: " Disabling driver and core paging can increase system performance on systems with 256 MB of ram, or more"
When i had 512 Mb , that didn't work because my system got slower than usual. now with 1024, is it usefull? can i play my games normally with no problems? do you experts advise me to disable that?
tks a lot, and sorry my poor english. i'm portuguese
P.S - windows xp, 1024 ram, pentium 4, 3 gigahertz
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shiftless
Captain
 Premium Member
 Joined: Mar 30, 2004 Posts: 362
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
!LordNykon
Cadet

 Joined: Apr 24, 2005 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tks a lot for the reply. continue the good job here 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
parputt
Forums Admin Premium Member
 Joined: Mar 08, 2002 Posts: 1406
|
Posted: Thu May 19, 2005 5:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just going to add my 2 cents here.
When I first went to XP I did a lot of research on tweaking. Specifically the swap/paging file. After reading more articles than I care to remember I came to the conclusion that some amount of swap/paging file was necessary no matter how much physical ram you have. So, with that said, here is another excellent article to read:
http://www.theeldergeek.com/paging_file.htm _________________ "Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience".
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|